The following is a guide for beginning shorebird watchers.
It assumes that you are:
a) interested in sorting out sandpipers
and
b) don't already have a fairly good
grasp of the process
If you know enough about shorebird identification to critique
this website, then you
probably don't need it. I am also relying heavily
on the sameness principle
which assumes that any shorebird one is likely to see
is most probably a commonly
occurring one (Paulson 1993). Since most birders
are interested in finding new species
which by definition are different, any birder, independent
of their experience, will
find things that look different if predisposed to do
so. The sameness principle predicts
that even if it looks different, it is probably a variant
of a commonly occurring
species. There is great value in making the assumption
that a bird is common until
proven otherwise (rather than uncommon until proven otherwise).
Becoming very
acquainted with the range of variations in the few common
species, before tackling
the less common ones, will help keep the wolves from
your door.
This site assumes you own at least one good
bird guide that you can look at while
reading through the flow charts and that you are looking
for shorebirds in North
America somewhere west of the Rocky Mountains and south
of the 49th parallel.
Information you need to collect (by whatever means
suits you) while looking at
shorebirds:
1. What is the date- since probability
of occurrence depends on time of year this
is a remarkably
useful way to eliminate possibilities.
2. How many are there- the sameness
principle predicts that the more there are
the more likely
they're common ones.
3. What they're standing on- some
shorebirds are more habitat specific than others.
4. Calidris sizes- which only
work when comparisons are possible
Small = Western Sandpiper sized or smaller
Medium = Sanderling or Dunlin
Large = not covered at this site (knots, pects etc)
5. Leg color
6. Webbed (partially webbed, actually)
toes- not always easy to see, but useful.
7. Bill shape- is it straight or curved;
tapered or uniform; thick or thin.
8. Breast- is it speckled, smudgy
or clear.
9. Back- does it have bright "vee"
shaped braces; do the feather tips look rounded
or pointy.
As you sort through flocks of the four most common species
look for transitional
individuals. Overtime birds molt out of one plumage
and into another and will show
some bits of one description and bits of another.
These transitional birds will look
different and are very likely the main source of misidentification
errors.
Four most common medium to small species
| Legs green to greenish-yellow |
|
||||||
| Legs not green to greenish yellow |
|
Next most common species if you've tried as hard
as you can to follow the sameness
principle, but the bird (and it's more likely to be bird
than birds) just won't go into one
of the common pigeon holes....
| Looks like a big Least Sandpiper
with dark legs (that is, bigger than a Western, but smaller than Sanderling) |
Baird's Sandpiper |
| Same size as a Western but lacking
the rufous vee braces (or much rufous in the back at all). Back feathers often look smallish, rounded and scale- like. Bill thick at base and straight. |
Semipalmated Sandpiper |
Species that you're probably not ready for if you need
these flow charts
(and unlikely to be taken seriously about by others if
your description looks
anything like the very abbreviated one's provided below)
| Green to greenish-yellow legs |
|
||||||||||||
| Look kind of like a Least Sandpiper some
parts of the year (but having dark legs) and kind of like a Western at other parts of the year, but without webs between toes. |
|
References
Chandler, R.J. 1989. North Atlantic Shorebirds.
Hayman, P., J.Marchant and T. Prater. 1986. Shorebirds: an identification guide.
Paulson, D. 1993. Shorebirds of the Pacific Northwest.
Rosair, D. and D.Cotteridge. 1995. Photographic Guide to Shorebirds of the World.
Sibley, D.A. 2000. Sibley Guide to Birds.